Ny times essay contest

A common sight today would be younger children playing mature video games. This is a sad thing, because kids at this age shouldn’t be playing these games. I believe that stores should refrain from selling mature games to minors, for this would lead to mental immaturity is some more mature topics. The stores should still sell them to minors if the parents are absolutely okay with them playing the game, and if the game contains anything like nudity or sex then the game should not be rated mature but should be rated explicit or adult.
The main reason that stores should not be allowed to sell mature games to minors is if a nine year old child would be exposed to mature content earlier in their lives (this is also why they should put nudity into an explicit rating) so they may not be able to mentally mature on some of those topics or not be that scared of going to jail.
The child may also get addicted to drugs because if their favorite video game character smokes then it cannot possibly hurt him in real life anyway, but a common misconception is that you may think that these games will also lead to violent behavior in children because they think their friends will just respawn, but that would only happen if say a two year old played the games. Because at least a nine year old should have the common knowledge to know that death is permanent. That argument is completely absurd that kids will kill people thinking they will come back just think about it if they did drugs that would be one thing, but playing games a lot no if you were to get obsessed with a game do you think that it would change your look on reality?
No it wouldn’t, but mature games still have bad influences to kids, so until they are at least fifteen they shouldn’t be allowed to play mature games. Because of the current age limit for mature games at seventeen, a lot more kids at younger ages play these mature games, and these games contain more mature content like functions where you can have kids in games and get STD’s. I know that from personal experience that some people make a goal of getting the most STD’s which can cause immaturity in kids in their early teens. This might cause kids to think that it is just something that won’t affect them later in their lives other themes like this would be drinking and other drug problems that might affect them, but this does not affect every kid that plays games that doesn’t mean it wont happen to your child.

We are having an open house with a tour of our facility on Wednesday, June 9th from 10:00 . until 2:00 . with lunch provided. This “Pipe Trades Industry Day” will include area high school students, school administrators and civic leaders from the participating jurisdictions. There will be interactive learning, trainers covering green awareness, fire safety, career opportunities, and a chance to observe the competition. A remote radio broadcast, along with Washington, . area sports professionals, will be onsite to help encourage young men and women on choosing rewarding career paths.

Great essay! I, too, think it should have won. Very impressive writing with wonderful insights. Part of me wonders if the student(s) who go to Yale and USC will venture far enough from their ivory towers get the point of this essay. The thing that scares me most about those and other “elite” institutions is the constant reinforcement of the status quo, or if you will, the fear of breaking from the “narrative”–and one could hear it in their essays. The winner, Mr. Handler, tries to avoid this by calling it “pastiche.” Sadly, his voice and essay fail to break from the elite-produced, status-quo-reinforcing narrative and “…[put] it into our own words.” If you want to live in a post-narrative world, stop reinforcing it and the institutions that produce them with trite essays. Bravo Liz on doing what the winner couldn’t!

Ny times essay contest

ny times essay contest

Media:

ny times essay contestny times essay contestny times essay contestny times essay contest